Blog Post
Last edited: September 17, 2024
Published: September 12, 2024
Konstantinos Madias
Sustainability Copywriter
Carbon credits have rapidly gained prominence as both a tool for businesses to manage their emissions and as a market-driven solution for global climate change. While businesses strive to reduce their greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, not all emissions can be eliminated immediately. This is where carbon credits come in, enabling companies to offset their unavoidable emissions by investing in verified climate projects.
As climate change continues to pose an existential threat, governments, consumers, and industries are all calling for urgent action. For companies, this translates into reducing emissions within their value chain and, where that’s not possible, using carbon credits to make up for the difference. The result is a dynamic system that not only helps companies reduce their carbon footprint but also contributes to global sustainability efforts.
At its core, a carbon credit represents one metric ton of CO2 (or its equivalent in other greenhouse gases) that has been avoided or removed from the atmosphere. The carbon market functions on a cap-and-trade system, where companies are allocated a certain number of credits based on their industry and their projected emissions.
The concept of carbon credits stems from the cap-and-trade model used to control emissions of sulfur dioxide in the U.S. in the 1990s. The system set caps on total emissions and allowed companies to buy and sell permits (credits) based on their emissions levels. Today, a similar market exists for carbon, with businesses worldwide trading credits in an effort to stay below their assigned emission limits.
The urgency of climate change requires immediate action, and many companies are turning to carbon credits as a means to meet their climate targets while they work on longer-term solutions to decarbonize. Here’s why carbon credits are so critical:
1. Encouraging Immediate Action: The science is clear—global temperatures must be kept below 1.5°C to prevent the most severe effects of climate change. For many companies, particularly those in high-emission sectors, achieving net-zero emissions within their operations alone is challenging. By purchasing carbon credits, businesses can take immediate action to mitigate their climate impact, even as they develop longer-term decarbonization strategies.
2. Global Responsibility: Carbon credits don’t just help the companies that buy them; they also fund projects around the world that have far-reaching environmental and social benefits. These projects range from reforestation and wetland restoration to renewable energy installations and carbon capture technologies. Many of these projects are located in developing nations, where the financial support from carbon credits helps drive both environmental and socio-economic progress.
3. Meeting Regulatory Requirements: Many countries now impose mandatory emission reduction targets, and businesses must meet these to avoid penalties. Carbon credits offer a way to comply with regulatory demands without shutting down critical operations. This is particularly important in industries like cement, steel, and aviation, where full decarbonization may not be feasible in the short term.
Not all carbon credits are equal in value or impact. High-quality carbon credits come from projects that not only reduce emissions but also offer co-benefits like biodiversity protection, improved air and water quality, and support for Indigenous communities. These credits are rigorously verified through standards like Gold Standard and Verified Carbon Standard (VCS), ensuring they deliver real, measurable benefits.
When companies invest in high-quality credits, they are doing more than simply offsetting their carbon emissions. They are contributing to global sustainability efforts, including the achievement of United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). This dual benefit helps companies decarbonize faster and improve their public image by demonstrating a commitment to broader environmental and social causes.
For companies engaging in the carbon credit market, ensuring transparency and avoiding greenwashing is critical. Greenwashing occurs when a company falsely portrays its environmental actions, often by using vague or misleading claims. To avoid this, frameworks like the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) and the Voluntary Carbon Market Integrity Initiative (VCMI) provide guidance for companies on how to credibly use carbon credits.
The SBTi encourages companies to set science-based emissions reduction targets and provides a roadmap for using carbon credits as part of a broader climate strategy. This ensures companies don’t rely solely on credits but also invest in reducing emissions throughout their value chain. The VCMI offers guidelines on making transparent claims about carbon credits, helping companies avoid misleading stakeholders about their environmental impact.
For businesses striving to reach net-zero, it’s clear that a dual approach—reducing emissions and using carbon credits for unavoidable emissions—is the most effective strategy. This allows companies to maintain operations while still taking responsibility for their environmental impact.
• Reducing Value Chain Emissions: Companies are increasingly focusing on reducing emissions throughout their value chain. This includes not just direct emissions (Scope 1 and 2) but also indirect emissions from suppliers and the use of their products (Scope 3). Reducing these emissions is critical for businesses aiming to meet the stringent climate targets set by global frameworks.
• Compensating for Unavoidable Emissions: Some emissions, especially in industries like cement, steel, or energy production, cannot be eliminated immediately. For these emissions, companies turn to carbon credits to bridge the gap until more sustainable technologies become available.
Scope 3 emissions, which include indirect emissions from the supply chain and product use, are often the largest part of a company’s carbon footprint. These emissions are notoriously difficult to tackle because they occur outside of a company’s direct control.
However, frameworks like SBTi’s Beyond Value Chain Mitigation (BVCM) allow businesses to use carbon credits to address Scope 3 emissions. By investing in high-quality carbon offset projects, companies can make meaningful contributions to global carbon reduction efforts while also working to decarbonize their supply chains. For many businesses, this dual strategy is the only feasible way to achieve net-zero targets within the required timeframe.
While carbon credits are essential in the short term, they are not a substitute for long-term emissions reduction strategies. Relying solely on credits without reducing emissions internally could lead to criticism and potential regulatory risks. The goal should be to use carbon credits as a temporary solution while steadily working towards a zero-carbon future.
As the global climate crisis deepens, carbon credits offer businesses a flexible, market-driven solution to reducing their environmental impact. By combining carbon credits with ambitious emissions reduction strategies, companies can meet their climate targets while contributing to a sustainable future.
For businesses, the key to success lies in transparency, adherence to global standards, and a commitment to high-quality carbon credits that deliver both environmental and social benefits. Whether used to compensate for Scope 3 emissions or to comply with tightening regulations, carbon credits are a powerful tool for responsible climate action.
7 mins read
October 25, 2024
7 mins read
October 3, 2024
4 mins read
September 20, 2024